Ranjeet v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed for fresh hearing in the week commencing 18.11.2024; counter affidavit permitted in the interim. No substantive decision taken.
What the court decided
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11209 of 2024
Applicant :- Ranjeet Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Uttam Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Uttam Kumar Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned A.G.A. has informed that notice has been served upon opposite party No.2, however, no one has appeared on behalf of opposite party No. 2.
List this case in the week commencing 18.11.2024 as fresh.
In the meantime, objection/ counter affidavit may be filed.
(Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.)
Order Date :- 23.10.2024 (Manoj K.)
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ranjeet
- respondent
State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/11209/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Azad Ali vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others
Mukesh Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchayati Raj, Lko. and 5 Others
Vineet Patel @ Vineet Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Ram Narayan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others