Murtaza Ali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listing order. Court noted the second opposite party was served but unrepresented, directed filing of a counter affidavit within two weeks, and fixed hearing in the week commencing 18.11.2024.
What the court decided
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10990 of 2024
Applicant :- Murtaza Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhaker Prakash,Amit Bhardwaj Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
- Heard Sri Sudhakar Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Nikhil Singh, learned AGA for the State.
- Learned AGA has informed that the opposite party no. 2 has already been served in this case, however, none has appeared.
- Let the counter affidavit / objection be filed in two weeks.
- List in the week commencing 18.11.2024 within top ten cases.
Order Date :- 21.10.2024 Om
Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Murtaza Ali
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Coram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/10990/2024
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S Lallite Filling Centre, a Sole Proprietorship Thru. Smt. Vijayakirti and Another Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Petroleum and 3 Others
Amar Singh Vs State of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. Food andCIVIL Supplies Lko.and Ors.
M/S Gobind Ram and Sons Barabanki Thru. Partner Mohit Agrawal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax and Registration, Lucknow and Others
Tulsi Ram vs Settlement Officer Consolidation, Sitapur and 2 Others