Court allowed bail application in FIR under U.P. Gangsters Act, noting applicant is already on bail in related cases. Bail granted on personal bond with sureties and standard conditions.
Applicant released on bail by furnishing personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65005
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10015 of 2024
Applicant :- Salman Alias Tippu Alias Timmu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.210 of 2024, under Section 2/3 (1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Mohanganj, District Amethi.
3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart. The copies of the bail orders are on record.
4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .
6. Let the applicant Salman alias Tippu alias Timmu be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 20.9.2024
akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the FIR under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Salman Alias Tippu Alias Timmu
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
