Applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case crime registered under cheating and forgery IPC sections at Mandawar, Bijnor. Court granted bail on parity with a co-accused earlier granted anticipatory bail, imposing standard conditions including cooperation in trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:167895
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9901 of 2024
Applicant :- Shivam Rajput Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dheeraj Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
MANU/SCOR/22410/2021 and in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , (2022) 10 SCC 51 , the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for anticipatory bail. The anticipatory bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.
(i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(iii). that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;
(iv). that in case charge-sheet is submitted the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;
(v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;
(vi). that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
(vii). that in case of breach of any of the above conditions the court concerned shall have the liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 22.10.2024 Ravi/-
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the applicant be granted anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.29 of 2023 on grounds of parity with a co-accused already granted bail?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nanha S/o Nabhan Kha vs. State of U.P.Relied on
1993 Crl.L.J. 938
Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of InvestigationRelied on
MANU/SCOR/22410/2021
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and AnotherRelied on
(2022) 10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shivam Rajput
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
