Allowed

Raj Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Sept 2024ABAIL/9439/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to Raj Kumar accused under Sections 498, 323, 504, 506 and 304 IPC. He alleged false implication by his wife and relatives after going missing, noting he resides with his parents.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on the basis of allegations of false implication and concluded that the case fits within the nexus of the decision Unnikrishnan MP v. State of Karnataka.

Raj Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another — Domestic Violence | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:155608

¶2

Court No. - 66

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9439 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Raj Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Sharma,Rajeev Upadhyay,Vikram Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶6

1&;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 85 o"kZ 2024] vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 323] 504] 506] 120ch-] 304ch-] Hkk0 na0 la0 ,oa /kkjk 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk duZyxat] ftyk iz;kxjkt esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶7

2&la{ksi esa vfHk;kstu dFkkud bl izdkj gS fd fnukad 28&2&2024 dks oknh eqdnek tks e`rdk dk firk gS] mlds }kjk lEcfU/kr Fkkus ij iz’uxr izkFkfedh bl vk’k; dh ntZ djk;h x;h fd mlus viuh iq=h dh 'kknh fnukad 15&4&2022 dks Jh vfUr’k dqekj ds lkFk lEiUu dh Fkh] ftlesa mlus vius lkeF;Z ds vuqlkj nku ngst fn;k Fkk ysfdu llqjkyhtu ifr vfUr’k dqekj] llqj f’kopju] lkl ek;k nsoh mQZ egknsoh] tsB jkt dqekj] tsBkuh eatw [kq’k ugha Fks vkSj cMh xkMh dh ekax dj mldh iq=h ds lkFk ekjihV dj ekufld o 'kkjhfjd mRihMu djrs FksA fnukad 14&2&2024 dks oknh dh iq=h jf’e flag us Qksu ij crk;k fd ifr vfUr’k dfqekj vius ifjokjtuksa ds dgus ij vc mls j[kus dks euk dj fn;k gS vkSj mlds lkFk xkyh xykSt dhA esjh tku dks [krjk gSA oknh us fnukad 14&2&2024 dks viuh iq=h dks Qksu

¶8

fd;k rks mlus Qksu ugh mBk;k fQj ckn esa vfUr’k dqekj us oknh dks Qksu ls lwpuk nh fd jf’e flag us vkRegR;k dj yh gSA oknh dh iq=h us vkRegR;k ugha fd;k gSA llqjkyhtu ds dgus ij "kM;a= iwoZd vfUr’k dqekj us oknh dh iq=h dh gR;k dj nh gSA

¶9

3&vkosnd dh vksj ls muds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶10

4&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd] erdk dk tsB gSA vkosnd funksZ"k gS mls iz’uxr ekeys esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA vkosnd dk iz’uxr ekeys ls dksbZ okLrk o ljksdkj ugha gSA vkosnd }kjk dHkh Hkh erdk ls ngst dh ekax ugha dh x;h gS vkSj u gh mlds }kjk ngst ds fy, erdk dks dHkh izrkfMr fd;k x;k gSA vkosnd] erdk ,oa mlds ifr ls vyx edku esa fuokl djrk gSA ifr iRuh ds vkilh fookn ds dkj.k erdk us Lo;a vkRegR;k dh gSA vkosnd }kjk iz’uxr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k x;k gSA vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk U;k;ky; dk /;ku bl vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk layXud 1 dh vksj vkd"V fd;k x;k tks erdk o mlds ifr ds edku ekfyd gS vkSj ftudk uke jke/kkjh ;kno gS] ftuds }kjk izHkkjh fujh{kd] Fkkuk duZyxat] iz;kxjkt ds le{k fn;k x;k izkFkZuk i= gS] ftlesa muds }kjk ;g vfHkdFku fd;k x;k gS fd Þerdk muds edku esa fdjk;s ij jgrh Fkh vkSj mlus Lo;a Qkalh yxkdj vkRegR;k dh gSA erdk ds dejs dk njoktk vanj ls can FkkAß 'ko foPNsnu vk[;k esa erdk dh e`R;q dk dkj.k ne ?kqVus ls gksuk crk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd vkosndk dks v’kadk gS fd mls iz’uxr ekeys esa fxjQrkj fd;k tk ldrk gS tc fd mlds fo:} dksbZ fo’oluh; lk{; ugha gSA ,slh n’kk esa vkosnd vfxze tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

¶11

2 of 3

¶12

5&blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA

¶13

6&ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk lq'khyk vxzoky izfr jkT; ¼,u-lhVh- fnYyh½ 2020 ,l0 lh0 lh0 vkuykbZu ,l0 lh0 98 esa izfrikfnr fl}kUr dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, vkSj i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds dFkuksa] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] vkosnd dh Hkwfedk vkSj ekeys ds lHkh rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekeys ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fopkj O;Dr fd;s vfxze tekur dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶14

7&rnuqlkj vkosnd jkt dqekj dk vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶15

8&mijksDr eqdnek vijk/k la[;k esa vkosnd dh fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa mls lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh larqf"V ij :i;k ipkl gtkj dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEu 'krksZ ds v/khu vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk;sxk%&

¶16

¼1½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA

¶17

¼2½ vkosnd xokgku dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugh djsxkA ¼3½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lkk{; ls dksbZ NsM NkM ugha djsxkA 9&;fn vkosnd }kjk mijksDr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g NwV jgsxh fd og vkosnd dh tekur fujLr dj ldsxkA

¶18

Order Date :- 24.9.2024 A.

¶19

3 of 3

¶20

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Raj Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Makbool vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivani Srivas vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sudheer Kumar Diwakar vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Omi @ Om Prakash and Another vs State of Up and Another

Geetu Seth vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Neelam vs State of U.P. and 10 Others