the police, was himself of the view that the applicant has been lured by her brother-in-law (dever) and being a rustic village lady she may not be in a position to understand the consequences. It is further submitted that the FIR has been registered only on account of the fact that the closure/final report has been filed by the investigating officer without acknowledging the fact that even if the closure/final report under Section 173(2) CrPC has been filed by an investigating officer, the matter may not be deemed closed for an informant and the same may be taken to its logical conclusion by moving a protest petition, as highlighted by the constitutional bench judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of 'Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police' MANU/SC/0063/1985 and there is no whisper in the FIR with regard to moving of any protest petition or about the acceptance of the final/closure submitted by the investigating officer and without acceptance of the final/closure report submitted by the investigating officer the FIR could not have been lodged. It is vehemently submitted that the advocate, who had filed the said claim petition, has also died and without there being any requisite mens rea with the applicant the FIR of this case has been lodged, however, the charge-sheet has already been submitted without arrest of the applicant. It is also submitted that the applicant is not having any previous criminal antecedents to her credit and there is no apprehension that after being released on anticipatory bail, she the applicant may flee from the course of law or may otherwise misuse the liberty.
