Single judge disposed of an anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the applicant upon consent of the state, with liberty to file a regular bail application.
Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file regular bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:139774
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8241 of 2024
Applicant :- Sudama And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Bhushan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Order Date :- 30.8.2024 Neeraj
Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar AntilReferred¶9
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 5191 of 2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudama And 2 Others
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
