Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by a father-in-law and mother-in-law accused under dowry and cruelty sections, observing there were no grounds to grant bail on the facts and circumstances presented.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; future bail application to be decided in terms of prescribed guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:139826
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8238 of 2024
Applicant :- Rajesh Singh Bhadoria And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Order Date :- 30.8.2024
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicants accused of dowry harassment, cruelty, and attempted murder.
Whether the allegations against the applicants have any base in the FIR and investigation material.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶6
(2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Singh Bhadoria
State of U.P
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
