The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by refusing bail but directing that any regular bail application filed upon surrender be decided expeditiously.
No anticipatory bail granted; direction for expeditious hearing of regular bail application upon surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:134514
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8228 of 2024
Applicant :- Mahesh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 22.8.2024/A.
Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicants are entitled to protection under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in anticipation of arrest?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I. and AnotherReferred¶12
S atender Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I. and Another; (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mahesh
Krishnaveer
State of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
