In this criminal miscellaneous anticipatory bail application, the Allahabad High Court refused to grant anticipatory bail to an applicant alleged of instigating a deceased to commit suicide. The court dismissed the application holding that the case was not fit for anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:135598
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7956 of 2024
Applicant :- Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Danish Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
suicide, therefore, in view of the seriousness of the allegations made against the applicant, he is not entitled to grant of anticipatory bail. The apprehension of the applicant is not founded on any material on record. Only on the basis of imaginary fear, anticipatory bail cannot be granted.
Order Date :- 23.8.2024 Ajeet
Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant facing charges of instigating suicide.
Whether the seriousness of allegations and conduct creating a situation for suicide preclude anticipatory bail.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Sonu
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
