, the Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application. The judge rejected the applicant's claim of non-ownership due to a defective sale deed lacking a seller signature and inconsistent government stamp usage.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed dismissing the prayer for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:131099
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7934 of 2024
Applicant :- Kaushar Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Alka Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 13.8.2024
D. Tamang
Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the alleged sale deed lacks seller signature and raises credibility issues regarding government stamp usage for UP registered vehicle.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kaushar Ali
State of U.P.
Vikram D. Chauhan
Dhirendra Tamang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
