Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by Vivekanand Shukla in connection with allegations of dual passport issuance was dismissed because the applicant failed to substantiate claims of a missing passport or explain false implication.
Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:132191
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7733 of 2024
Applicant :- Vivekanand Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raja Sahani,Richesh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 14.8.2024
D. Tamang
Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the applicant failed to explain dual passport issuance and lacks documentation regarding a missing previous passport.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vivekanand Shukla
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
