Vijendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application filed under 438 Cr.P.C. was treated as infructuous and withdrawn by the applicant. The application was accordingly dismissed.
Anticipatory bail application filed under 438 Cr.P.C. was treated as infructuous and withdrawn by the applicant. The application was accordingly dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:147457
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7529 of 2024
Applicant :- Vijendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Prakash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous and as such he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application.
The anticipatory bail application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 10.9.2024 K.K. Maurya
Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijendra Singh
Vikram D. Chauhan
Kamlesh Kumar Maurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court