Anticipatory bail sought in a Gorakhpur theft case where the applicant's name emerged from a co-accused's confession. The court noted six similar pending criminal cases and rejected the applicant's plea of false implication as vague and lacking factual foundation, then rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:136428
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7159 of 2024
Applicant :- Aniket Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnish Sahai Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
"14. That, the applicant has no concern with the other co-accused and
investigating officer has falsely implicated the applicant on the basis of false, fabricated and concocted story only on the basis of criminal history of the applicant."
Order Date :- 27.8.2024 D. Tamang
Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in a theft case where his name surfaced from a co-accused's confessional statement and he has six pending criminal cases.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ruli Ram Vs. State of HaryanaRelied on¶7
(2002) 7 SCC 691 · Who else cites this
Ram Udgar Singh Vs. State of BiharRelied on¶7
(2004) 10 SCC 443 · Who else cites this
Brahm Swaroop Vs. State of U.P.Relied on¶7
(2011) 6 SCC 288 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Aniket Mishra
State of U.P.
Another
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
