Shyama v. State of U.P. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6875 of 2024
Applicant :- Shyama Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Singh Rajput Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
- Learned A.G.A. for the State submits that in the present case charge sheet has been submitted.
- Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file supplementary affidavit.
- List this case on 26.7.2024.
Order Date :- 16.7.2024 VMA
Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shyama
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vikram D. Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/6875/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Deepak Verma
- Order 2 · Deepak Verma
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court