Dismissed

Anurag @ Golu and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC19 Jul 2024ABAIL/6288/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as withdrawn by the applicant, granting liberty to file the same before the court below and ensuring no coercive action is taken for 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach lower court for bail with 15 days of protection from coercive action.

Anurag @ Golu and Another vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:115024

¶2

Court No. - 73

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6288 of 2024 Applicant :- Anurag @ Golu And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

¶4

Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.

¶6

The present Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants- Anurag @ Golu and Vinay Vikram @ Sonu in Case Crime No.98 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 308 I.P.C., Police Station - Adalhat, District - Mirzapur.

¶7

After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with liberty to file bail application before the court below.

¶8

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Under the circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicant, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶10

The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction.

¶11

Order Date :- 19.7.2024 D. Tamang

¶12

Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anurag @ Golu and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anurag @ Golu and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Qazi Ziaulrehman vs State of U.P.

Ajay Kumar Sharma @ Ajay Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Sadhu @ Sarvajeet vs State of Up and 3 Others

Chandrapal vs State of U.P. and Another

Rohtas and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Naved vs State of Up and Another