The appellant argued that an anticipatory bail application became infructuous due to arrest and regularization. The court dismissed the application as no longer viable.
None. The application was dismissed being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:118883
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5818 of 2024
Applicant :- Amit Alias Baljeet Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunit Kumar,Yatish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Chandra Prakash Mishra,G.A.,Kartikeya Shukla
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Shri Yatish Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. The applicant has been arrested and has been enlarged on regular bail.
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 25.7.2024 Ashish Tripathi
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application is maintainable post-arrest and grant of regular bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Alias Baljeet Singh
State of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
