Vicky @ Yogendra v. State of U.P. & 3 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:112614
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5461 of 2024
Applicant :- Vicky @ Yogendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anil Kumar Ojha,G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
At the outset, Sri Ajay Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ankit Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant application has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Learned AGA and Sri Umesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 are present.
Order Date :- 15.7.2024 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vicky @ Yogendra
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/5461/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court