Sandip Alias Rahul v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad listed an anticipatory bail application for hearing to allow the applicant to file a supplementary affidavit.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5158 of 2024
Applicant :- Sandip Alias Rahul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anish Kumar Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant, place this application on 09.08.2024 in the additional cause list to enable him to file supplementary affidavit.
Order Date:- 9.7.2024 Siddhant
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sandip Alias Rahul
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/5158/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court