Anticipatory bail sought for an applicant accused under Sections 304 and 201 IPC in a complaint case at Agra, citing false implication, no criminal antecedents and parity with a similarly placed co-accused granted anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:109978
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4886 of 2024
Applicant :- Netrapal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Chahar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Indra Raj
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall make himself available on each and every date fixed in the matter by the court concerned;
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court;
(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if she has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court.
Order Date :- 8.7.2024 Neeraj
Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant falsely implicated in a complaint case under Sections 304 and 201 IPC should be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Netrapal
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
