The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the applicant's counsel. The court dispensed with a regular bail application and directed the applicant to surrender within one month, finding no need for coercive action until surrender.
Applicant directed to surrender within one month; no coercive action to be taken during this period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120024
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4609 of 2024
Applicant :- Arif Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mashaluddin Shah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 26.7.2024
Shalini
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be allowed, dismissed, or withdrawn considering the specific context of the case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Arif
Krishan Pahal
Shalini Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal and Shalini Jaiswal
Parties & counsel
