Ashfaq and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court discharged the anticipatory bail application regarding a disclosure of identity dispute., citing procedural reasons and lack of factual similarity or staying of underlying proceedings. Quality classified as thin due to brevity.
What did the court decide?
Application disposed of without granting anticipatory bail.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120438
Court No. - 90
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC IInd ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4203 of 2024
Applicant :- Ashfaq And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Arif Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ f}rh; vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosndx.k Ashfaq, Sannu @ Gul Sanowar, Tillu @ Gulshan, Saleem and Mujahid dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 662 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 149] 354] 452] 323] 352] 324] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 7@8 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk dadj[ksM+k] ftyk esjB esa vfxze tekur iznku djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosndx.k dk ;g f}rh; vfxze tekur vkosnu i= gS] mudk izFke vfxze tekur vkosnui= la0 1229 lu 2024 vkns’k fn0 13&3&2024 }kjk fujLr fd;k x;k FkkA mudk dFku gS fd vkosndx.k dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mUgksaus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl ekeys esa lg vfHk;qDrx.k lyeku vkfn dh vfxze tekur] vfxze tekur vkosnu i= la0 781 lu 2024 esa blh U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 12&2&2024 }kjk iznku dh tk pqdh gS rFkk orZeku vkosndx.k dk dsl mUgha lg vfHk;qDrksa ds leku gS] blfy, vkosndx.k Hkh lg vfHk;qDrksa ls lekurk ds vk/kkj ij vfxze tekur ikus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application is maintainable given its factual similarity to a dismissed case.
Whether the Court should apply the factual equivalence rule from precedents or distinguish the facts of the current case.
Whether the proceedings listed in the current application have been stayed, affecting the decision on bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ashfaq And 4 Others
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/4203/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court