Chirag Khurana v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a brief order dated 5.7.2024 in which the anticipatory bail application was adjourned due to the non-appearance of the applicant's counsel to press the matter.
What did the court decide?
Matter was adjourned to 26.07.2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3802 of 2024
Applicant :- Chirag Khurana Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharam Raj Tripathi,Pankaj Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
- List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels on behalf of the applicant. Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the State is present.
- Learned counsel for the State states that he has filed counter affidavit which is on record and submits that the investigation in the matter has concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant, para 8 and annexure no.C.A-2 of the same has been placed before the Court.
- Since there is no representation on behalf of the applicant, the matter is adjourned for today.
- Let the matter be listed on 26.07.2024 along with connected matter.
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Chirag Khurana
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Samit Gopal J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/3802/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court