Anticipatory bail application dismissed as applicant became a proclaimed offender after 30-day period expired following issuance of arrest warrant under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C.
Application for anticipatory bail barred and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:16661
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 371 of 2024
Applicant :- Isarar @ Isarar Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhairo Nath,Amit Bhardwaj Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.L
Supreme Court in Lavesh vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2012) 8 SCC 730, Prem Shankar Prasad vs. State of Bihar , 2021 SCC OnLine SC 955 and State of Haryana Vs. Dharamraj 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1085 the instant anticipatory bail application appears to be is not maintainable and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 23.2.2024 Muk
Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application is maintainable after the issuance of arrest warrant and expiry of 30 days.
Whether a person who becomes a proclaimed offender after expiry of time is entitled to anticipatory bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lavesh vs. State (NCT of Delhi)Explained¶12
(2012) 8 SCC 730 · Who else cites this
Prem Shankar Prasad vs. State of BiharExplained¶12
2021 SCC OnLine SC 955 · Who else cites this
State of Haryana Vs. DharamrajExplained¶12
2023 SCC OnLine SC 1085 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Isarar @ Isarar Khan
State Of U.P.
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
