The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as having become infructuous because the applicant was arrested during the pendency of the application.
Application dismissed as infructuous due to arrest of applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:143316
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2924 of 2024
Applicant :- Anuj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Though It Principal Secretary And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Brijesh Kumar Chaturvedi,G.A.,Shri Ram Pandey
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 4.9.2024 Ajeet
Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application becomes infructuous upon the applicant's arrest during its pendency.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anuj
State Of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Ajeet Kumar Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
