Partly allowed

Shrikrishn v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Dec 2024ABAIL/2735/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to Shrikrishn in Complaint Case No. 5302 of 2016 involving offences under various IPC sections, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties and complying with specific conditions regarding investigation and trial cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted on personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, non-interference, and appearance in court.

Shrikrishn vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 15

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2735 of 2024

¶3

Applicant :- Shrikrishn Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar,Shrikant Tripathi,Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Complaint Case No. 5302 of 2016, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 436, 427 of IPC Police Station -Dhaurahra District- Kheri.

¶7

The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant matter on the basis of the false and concocted story. He submits that issuance of summons was not in his knowledge and when he was intimated that some criminal proceedings is pending against, he is ready to cooperate with the criminal proceedings. He added that he is 56 years old person and there is no ample evidence against the applicant that he was involved in committing offence. He added that the applicant undertakes that he will cooperate with the investigation proceedings as well as in the trial proceedings and would never abscond from the same. He next added that there is acute apprehension that police will arrest him thus, submission is that the the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

¶8

On the other hand, learned AGA appearing for the State has opposed the submissions aforesaid.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, till the next date of listing, the present applicant- Shrikrishn shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime (supra) on an interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶11

(ii) that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

¶12

(iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;

¶13

(iv) that in case chargesheet is submitted the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;

¶14

(v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;

¶15

(vi) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;

¶16

(vii) that in case of breach of any of the above conditions the court concerned shall have the liberty to cancel the bail.

¶17

Issue notice to the opposite party no. 2 returnable at an early date.

¶18

Steps be taken within one week.

¶19

List/put up this matter in third week of January 2025.

¶20

In the meantime, learned counsel for the State may file counter affidavit.

¶21

Order Date :- 13.12.2024 Ram Murti

¶22

Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shrikrishn v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shrikrishn v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vakeel Ahmad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Miraj Ahmad and 9 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Firdaus Akhtar @ Shadab Akhtar vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko

Haribhan Yadav@ Pappu vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Sandeep Maitee vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Ram Prakash Tiwari and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Pratapgarh and Another