Satyaram v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant submitted that the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous. The court dismissed the application on this ground.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:114891
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1803 of 2024
Applicant :- Satyaram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
- In view of above submission, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.7.2024 D. Tamang
Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satyaram
Coram
Vikram D. Chauhan
Dhirendra Tamang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/1803/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court