Allowed

Syed Mehdi Hasan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Anothers

Allahabad HC6 Aug 2024ABAIL/1755/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought anticipatory bail in FIR No.0381/2021 alleging cheating and forgery offences. Counsel noted applicant already received anticipatory bail on similar allegations in Case Crime No.365/2021. Court extended the same benefit, allowing the application subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; applicant to be released on personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000 each with standard conditions.

Syed Mehdi Hasan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:53745

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1755 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Syed Mehdi Hasan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Anothers Counsel for Applicant :- Shamshad Ahmad,Faraz Ahmad,Mohammad Shahzad Ahmad,Mohammad Suhail Khan,Taiba Fatima Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.

¶7

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

¶8

3. The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.0381 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 504, 120B IPC, Police Station Wazirganj, Commissionerate Lucknow.

¶9

4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that on the same allegation, Case Crime No.365 of 2021 was registered in which the applicant was granted the benefit of anticipatory bail vide order dated 30.07.2024.

¶10

5. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.

¶11

6. Considering the allegations in the present case also being similar to Case Crime No.365 of 2021, the benefit of anticipatory bail is extended to the applicant in the present case also. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.

¶12

7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Syed Mehdi Hasan be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶14

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

(d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

¶17

Order Date :- 6.8.2024

¶18

Digitally signed by :- nishant NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Syed Mehdi Hasan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Mehdi Hasan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Riyaz Alias Khurchali Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt Lko.

Anjani Kumar @ Nankau Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.

Manish Mandal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Taufik Vs State of U.P Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Syed Mehdi Hasan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Anothers

Kamlesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko