Anticipatory bail application dismissed, with liberty to move a regular bail application, on which the applicant would be entitled to the benefit of the Satender Kumar Antil judgment.
Liberty to move a regular bail application; Satender Kumar Antil benefit available thereon.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1564 of 2024
Applicant :- Vimal Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiva Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
The instant anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move regular bail application.
If the petitioner moves regular bail application, the benefit of Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51 shall be available to him.
Order Date :- 16.7.2024 Anurag
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
(2022)10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vimal Mishra
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
