Harsh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC. The State counsel had not received instructions; the court adjourned the matter for ten days as fresh, directing the State counsel to complete instructions meanwhile.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12130 of 2024
Applicant :- Harsh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
- Learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions in the matter.
- List this case after 10 days as fresh.
- Meanwhile, learned A.G.A. shall complete his instructions.
Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Radhika
Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Harsh
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/12130/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court