Dismissed

Dular Chandra Ram v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Dec 2024ABAIL/12003/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court dismissed withdrawn anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC, directing surrender within one month and regular bail disposal per Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of with direction to surrender within one month and file regular bail for disposal in view of Satender Kumar Antil guidelines. No coercive action for one month.

Dular Chandra Ram vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:197174

¶2

Court No. - 65

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12003 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Dular Chandra Ram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ranjeet Kumar Patel,Sanjeev Kumar Khare Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Khare, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 55 of 2009, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station- Rasra, District- Ballia.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 17.12.2024 Vikas

¶14

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dular Chandra Ram v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dular Chandra Ram v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Mall vs State of U.P. and Another

Jai Narayan vs State of U.P. and Another

Monu vs State of Up

Raju Alias Ambrish Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Sagar Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Ranju Devi and Another vs State of U.P. and Another