Vinod Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC adjourned at counsel's request to the first week of January 2025 as fresh; no substantive decision made.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11894 of 2024
Applicant:- Vinod Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
On the request of learned counsel for the applicant, put up this case in the First Week of January, 2025 as fresh.
Order Date :- 12.12.2024 Sanjeet
Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vinod Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/11894/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court