Vijay Pal v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant's counsel submitted that the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was not pressed. The Court dismissed the application accordingly.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:195312
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11861 of 2024
Applicant :- Vijay Pal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
- List has been revised.
- Sri Janardan Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as not pressed.
- In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 13.12.2024 Ravi/-
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be maintained?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijay Pal
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/11861/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court