Allowed

Sandeep v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Dec 2024ABAIL/11653/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought anticipatory bail in a 2017 case registered for offences including Sections 147, 354, 323, 506 and 376 IPC. Counsel argued false implication, delay in FIR, contradictions in statements and co-accused already granted bail. Court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bond with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions.

Sandeep vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:193618

¶2

Court No. - 64

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11653 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Sandeep Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶6

1&;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 257 o"kZ 2017] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 354] 323] 506] 376MhHkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk lgtuok] ftyk xksj[kiqj esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶7

2&vfHk;kstu dFkkud bl izdkj gS fd iz’uxr izkFkfedh fnukad 25&3&2017 dks vkosnd ,oa vU; lg&vfHk;qDrksa ds fo:} lEcfU/kr Fkkus ij bl vk’k; dh iathd`r djk;h x;h fd fnukad 10&1&2027 dks 'kke lk<s lkr cts okfnuh tc 'kkSp djus x;h Fkh rHkh jkLrs esa vkosnd ,oa vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k] okfnuh@ihfMrk ds lkFk NsMNkM djus yxsaA

¶8

3&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶9

4&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gS] mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA vkosnd }kjk ,slk dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k x;k gS tSlk fd iz’uxr izkFkfedh esa of.kZr fd;k x;k gSA vkosnd dk iz’uxr ekeys ls

¶10

dksbZ okLrk o ljksdkj ugh gSA vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd iz’uxr izkFkfedh <kbZ ekg ds foyEc ls ntZ djk;h x;h gS] ftldk dksbZ leqfpr Li"Vhdj.k vfHk;kstu dh vksj ls ugha fn;k x;k gSA ihfMrk }kjk vius 161 na0 iz0 la0 ds c;ku esa cykRdkj dh ckr ugha dgh x;h gSA ihfMrk dk c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 164 na0 iz0 la0 ikap ekg ntZ fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa mlus vkosnd ,oa vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k pUnz’ks[kj] dfiy o pUnzs’k ds fo:} cykRdkj dk vkjksi yxk;k gSA iz’uxr ekeys ds mijksDr lg&vfHk;qDrx.k dfiy] jkew] pUnz’ks[kj o pUnzs’k dh vfxze tekur nkf.Md izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k 1674 o"kZ 2024 o 1710 o"kZ 2024 esa bl U;k;ky; ds vkns’k dze’k% fnukad 9&4&2024 ds }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA

¶11

5&vkxs vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd ihfMrk us viuk fpfdRlh; ijh{k.k djkus ls euk dj fn;k gSA ihfMrk ,d 'kknh’kqnk efgyk gSA iz’uxr izkFkfedh] ihfMrk ds c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 161 o 164 na0 iz0 la0 esa ?kksj fojks/kkHkkl gS] ftlls vfHk;kstu dFkkud dh iqf"V ugha gksrh gSA vkosnd ds fo:} voj U;k;ky; ds vkns’k fnukad 12&9&2024 ds }kjk tekurh; okj.V tkjh fd;k x;k gS rFkk vkosnd ds fo:} xSj tekurh; okj.V tkjh ugha gqvk gS vkSj u gh na0 iz0 la0 dh /kkjk 82&83 dh dksbZ dk;Zokgh fu"ikfnr ugh dh x;h gSA vkosnd dks v’kadk gS fd mls iz’uxr ekeys esa fxjQrkj fd;k tk ldrk gS tc fd mlds fo:} dksbZ fo’oluh; lk{; ugha gSA vkosnd dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA ,slh n’kk esa vkosnd lekurk ds vk/kkj ij vfxze tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

¶12

6&blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA

¶13

2 of 3

¶14

7&ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk lq'khyk vxzoky izfr jkT; ¼,u-lhVh- fnYyh½ 2020 ,l0 lh0 lh0 vkuykbZu ,l0 lh0 98 esa izfrikfnr fl}kUr dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, vkSj i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds dFkuksa] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] vkosnd dh Hkwfedk vkSj ekeys ds lHkh rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekeys ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fopkj O;Dr fd;s vfxze tekur dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶15

8&rnuqlkj vkosnd lanhi dk vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶16

9&mijksDr eqdnek vijk/k la[;k esa vkosnd dh fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa mls lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh larqf"V ij :i;k ipkl gtkj dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEu 'krksZ ds v/khu vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk;sxk%&

¶17

¼1½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA

¶18

¼2½ vkosnd xokgku dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugh djsxkA ¼3½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lkk{; ls dksbZ NsM NkM ugha djsxkA 10&;fn vkosnd }kjk mijksDr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g NwV jgsxh fd og vkosnd dh tekur fujLr dj ldsxkA

¶19

Order Date :- 11.12.2024 A.

¶20

3 of 3

¶21

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Nath Awasthi vs State of U.P.

Smt. Sunita Devi vs State of Up

Manoj Tripathi and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Virendra @ Shaktiman vs State of U.P. and Another

Anand Kumar Maurya and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Girishchandra Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another