Dr. Ishrat Ali v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment of hearing to allow applicant's counsel to explain criminal history. No final order passed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11448 of 2024
Applicant :- Dr. Ishrat Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Fazil,Salman Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
On the request of learned counsel for the applicant, list after ten days as fresh.
In the meantime, learned counsel for the applicant may explain the criminal history of the applicant.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024 RPD
Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dr. Ishrat Ali
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/11448/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court