Pankaj Mani Tripathi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a procedural order listing an anticipatory bail application for ten days. The Additional Government Advocate stated he had not received instructions. The matter is adjourned to allow the respondent to complete instructions. No substantive decision on bail or merits was recorded.
What the court decided
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11296 of 2024
Applicant :- Pankaj Mani Tripathi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Karunesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Learned A.G.A. states that he has not received instructions in the matter.
List after ten days as fresh. In the meantime, learned A.G.A. may complete instructions in the matter.
Order Date :- 22.11.2024 Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pankaj Mani Tripathi
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/11296/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Vipin Chandra Dixit
- Order 2 · Vipin Chandra Dixit
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court