The High Court adjourned the merits of an anticipatory bail application after noting that the applicant had not pressed the relief on merit. The court ordered no coercive action for two weeks pending surrender and regular bail processing as per Satender Kumar Antil.
No coercive action for two weeks; direction for expeditious disposal of regular bail upon surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:190316
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11210 of 2024 Applicant :- Naresh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Chahar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024/RPD
Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail affording him no coercive action for a specific period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Naresh
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
