Disposed

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC23 Nov 2024ABAIL/11110/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application where the applicant did not press the plea on merit but sought expeditious disposal of a regular bail application, the court refused the anticipatory bail, directed surrender within two weeks, and ordered expeditious hearing of the regular bail application citing Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Refused anticipatory bail; directed surrender within two weeks and expeditious consideration of regular bail application.

Sachin and Another vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:183422

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11110 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Sachin And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Ji Mishra,Kaushal Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Anand Ji Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 230 of 2023, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station-Medical, District- Meerut.

¶8

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicants surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 23.11.2024 Nitin Verma

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rekha vs State of U.P.

Sonu Gupta vs State of U.P. and Another

Radhey Shyam Jaiswal @ Pappu and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Guddo and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Anuj Yadav and 3 Others vs State of Up and Another

Surendra Singh vs State of Up and Another