Jay Sagar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed anticipatory bail to applicant accused of cheating and forgery, noting alibi, lack of institutional bias, and absence of procedural lapse in FIR registration.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail allowed on condition that applicant does not repeat alleged acts and cooperates with investigation.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:174414
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10816 of 2024
Applicant :- Jay Sagar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Parvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
1&;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 0584 o"kZ 2023] vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 304 ch-] Hkk0 na0 la0 ,oa /kkjk 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk estk] ftyk iz;kxjkt esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA
2&la{ksi esa vfHk;kstu dFkkud bl izdkj gS fd fnukad 24&11&2023 dks oknh eqdnek lksus yky lkdsr }kjk iz’uxr izkFkfedh lEcfU/kr Fkkus ij bl vk’k; dh iathd`r djk;h x;h fd mlus viuh iq=h jatuk dk fookg njckjh yky ds iq= t; lkxj ds lkFk fgUnw jhfr fjokt ds vuqlkj lEiUu fd;k Fkk ftlesa mlus vius lkeF;Z ds vuqlkj nku ngst fn;k Fkk ijUrq mldh iq=h ds llqjky okys fn, x;s nku ngst ls lUrq"V ugha Fks vkSj vfrfjDr ngst ds :i esa eksVj lkbfdy dh ekax djrs Fks rFkk oknh dh iq=h dks ekjkihVk djrs FksA fnukad 10&11&2023 dks oknh ds iq=h dks mlds llqj njckjh yky tSly] jke lkxj] t; lkxj] fnos’k vkSj njckjh yky dh vkSjr us ,d jk; gksdj tgj fiyk dj ngst ds dkj.k ekj MkykA
3&vkosnd dh vksj ls muds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jay Sagar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/10816/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court