Disposed

Allah Mehar and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Dec 2024ABAIL/10554/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Deepak Verma, J. refused the anticipatory bail application on merits as counsel did not press the prayer. Instead, the court directed the applicants to surrender within two weeks to avail of expedited bail disposal and to keep the non-bailable warrant in abeyance during that period.

What did the court decide?

Non-bailable warrant in abeyance for two weeks; direction to surrender within two weeks for expedited bail consideration.

Allah Mehar and Another vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:189562

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10554 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Allah Mehar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Muqeem Ansari,Mohd. Akbar Shah Alam Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

¶7

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicants to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.152 of 2004, under Section 5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, registered at Police Station- Bhopa, District- Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicants surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned Court below, whichever is earlier, non-bailable warrant issued against the applicants, shall be kept in abeyance.

¶13

With the above observations and directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 3.12.2024 SKD

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Allah Mehar and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Allah Mehar and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Chandra Sharma Alias Dinesh Kumar Sharma and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepu Urf Pradeep and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Atul Pathak vs State of U.P. and Another

Zafar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Abad vs State of Up

Lalit vs State of U.P.