Disposed

Priyanka Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Others

Allahabad HC1 Oct 2024A483/683/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On an application for speedy trial under CrPC Section 483, the Allahabad High Court directed the subordinate court to conclude proceedings of a pending case expeditiously within six months, relying on Supreme Court precedents regarding the right to speedy trial under Article 21.

What did the court decide?

Directed the concerned court to conclude the proceedings of the pending case expeditiously within six months.

Priyanka Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:67821

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 683 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Priyanka Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Bahadur Singh,Shubh Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for the following main relief:-

¶8

"Issue an order or direction commanding to Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Civil Judge (S.D.) First, Sultanpur to decide the case no 4172/2024 "State Verses Vinay Singh and others" arising out of crime No. 485/2020 under section 498-A/323/504/506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, related to police station Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur pending before Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Civil Judge (S.D.) First, Sultanpur since 15/12/2020 expeditiously with immediate effect within six months."

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671 , the right to speedy trial/disposal of case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

¶10

With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of .

¶11

Order Date :- 1.10.2024 Jyoti/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Priyanka Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanka Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dinesh Yadav and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thur. Secy Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Sujeet Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Mohd. Iliyas Khan @ Shebu Vs the State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. and Others

Gufran @ Gufran Ahmad and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Secrtt. U.P. Govt. Lko. and Another

Chhotoo @ Vivek Kumar Lodhi vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. and Another

Shyam Sundar vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko.