Application filed seeking expedition in a pending criminal trial. The court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously citing constitutional right to speedy trial.
Direction to the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65368
Court No. - 13
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 646 of 2024
Applicant :- Satveer Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Virijendra Kumar Singh,Amit Kumar Singh,Vinay Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief:-
"Wherefore, it is very respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the trail court to decide the Criminal Case No. 7137/2012, relating to case crime no. 263/2011 under section 279/304A/427 IPC, P.S. Husainganj Lucknow, (State of U.P. versus Satyaveer singh ) pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate First Lucknow, as expeditious as possible or within a period as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671 , the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of .
Order Date :- 21.9.2024
Vinay/-
Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and AnotherReferred¶10
Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248 · Who else cites this
Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of BiharReferred¶10
Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81 · Who else cites this
Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of BiharReferred¶10
Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671 · Who else cites this
Satveer Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
