Disposed

Rajendra Kumar Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2024A483/601/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought directions for speedy disposal of a pending criminal case. The High Court directed the concerned court to expedite proceedings, relying on Supreme Court precedents affirming the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the concerned court to conclude the proceedings of the impugned criminal case expeditiously.

Rajendra Kumar Verma vs State of U.P. Thru. Its… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:61849

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 601 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohit Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief:-

¶8

"Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable direction to the court concern to hear and decide the Criminal Misc. Case No. 1253 of 2010 "State Vs. Rajendra" arising out of Case Crime No. 302/1996, under section 41/411 of IPC, Police Station - Sangrampur, District- Sultanpur now Amethi pending in the court of Civil Judge/F.T.C. (Senior Division) Sultanpur, date fixed as 13.09.2024, expeditiously within a stipulated period or as early as possible, in the interest of justice."

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671 , the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

¶10

With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of .

¶11

Order Date :- 9.9.2024 Vinay/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rajendra Kumar Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Kumar Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd. Anas and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Brahma Prakash Dubey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Nuzhat Abidi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Munnu Singh Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another

Mohammad Meraj @ Mohd. Meraj Siddiki and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Piyush Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home,Lko. and Another