Rahul Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56784

Court No. - 11

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 555 of 2024

Applicant :- Rahul Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi,Vivek Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State.

¶7

2. Instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C (Now Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) has been filed praying for a direction to the learned court below to expeditiously decide the proceedings pending before it.

¶8

3. On the other hand learned AGA on the basis of Constitution Bench judgment in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of U.P and Ors- 2024 (256) AIC 66 (SC) argues that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the constitutional Courts should not normally fix a time-bound schedule for disposal of cases pending in any Court. It has further been held in the said judgment that the issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the concerned Courts where the cases are pending.

¶9

4. Considering the aforesaid Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad (supra) the instant application is disposed of permitting the applicant to move an application before the concerned Court pointing out the grounds of urgency. In the event, the applicant does so, the concerned Court may consider whether the case should be expedited having regard to the urgency of the case.

¶10

Order Date :- 21.8.2024 prateek

¶11

Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rahul Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Juvenie X Thru. His Natural Guardian Father Y Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Shaiq Ahmed Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Satyam Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Bhaskar Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Bhusaili vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another

Bal Krishna vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another