Dismissed

Brijesh Kumar Verma Alias Tillu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC1 Mar 2024A483/130/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. The applicant sought a direction for the expeditious conclusion of a pending criminal trial ordered within three months. The Judge dispensed with the notice to a respondent and disposed of the petition by directing the Trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Trial Court to conclude the pending criminal trial expeditiously within three months, without unnecessary adjournments.

Brijesh Kumar Verma Alias Tillu vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:18777

¶2

Court No. - 11

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 130 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Verma Alias Tillu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

¶7

2. In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.2 is hereby dispensed with.

¶8

3. By means of this petition filed under Section 483 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-

¶9

"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned Trial Court i.e. Judicial Magistrate-II, Lucknow to conclude the trial of Criminal Case No.2592 of 2011 (State vs. Brijesh Kumar Verma and another), arising out of Case Crime No.64 of 2011, under Sections 41/411, 420, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C., Police Station-Cantt., District-Lucknow, pending before it, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months, in the interest of law and justice."

¶10

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length has requested that ends of justice would suffice if necessary directions for disposal of the aforesaid criminal case is issued to the learned court below, strictly in accordance with law, within the time stipulated.

¶11

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate has no objection to the aforesaid innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶12

6. Considering the aforesaid innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of finally this petition at the admission stage directing the learned Trial Court i.e. Judicial MagistrateII, Lucknow to conclude the trial of Criminal Case No.2592 of 2011 (State vs. Brijesh Kumar Verma and another), arising out of Case Crime No.64 of 2011, under Sections 41/411, 420, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C., Police Station-Cantt., District-Lucknow, pending before her/ him since 2011, expeditiously strictly in

¶13

accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment by affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned by fixing short dates and without giving any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties.

¶14

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]

¶15

Order Date :- 1.3.2024 Suresh/

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Brijesh Kumar Verma Alias Tillu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijesh Kumar Verma Alias Tillu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Satish Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Capt Gurpreet Singh vs State of U.P Thru. Special Secy. Deptt. Civil Aviation Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Victim/Complainant in Case Crime No. 484/2023 vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others

Udayraj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Pankaj Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home at Lko.

Brijesh Kumar Verma Alias Tillu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another