Application challenging an interim maintenance order fixing Rs. 7,000. The High Court declined to disturb the interim amount, rejected the prayers, and directed the Trial Court to decide the maintenance application finally within two months, taking note of Rajnesh v. Neha.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:119417
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8796 of 2024
Applicant :- Manjeet Dubey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prabhat Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 25.7.2024 SK Srivastava
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim maintenance of Rs. 7,000 fixed by the Trial Court was excessive given the applicant's income.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajnesh vs. Neha and AnotherReferred
(2021) 2 SCC 324 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjeet Dubey
State of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
