Disposed

Anuj Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Sept 2024A482/8721/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./538 BNSS, 2023, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad observed that while parties alleged a settlement, the veracity remained unverified. The Court adjourned for verification by the trial court and granted a temporary stay on coercive action but disposed of the petition without final relief.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action shall be taken against the applicant till verification of the compromise; the petition is disposed of.

Anuj Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:66847

¶2

Court No. - 11

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8721 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Anuj Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA appearing for respondent no.1, and Sri Yogesh Soni, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama today in Court on behalf of the respondent no. 2, which is taken on record.

¶7

Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./538 BNSS, 2023 has been filed contending that all the parties in dispute have arrived at a settlement by way of a compromise deed dated 02.07.2024, a copy of which is annexure 4 to the petition, pertaining to Complaint Case No.1800040/2013 under Sections 376, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Sareni, District Raebareli, which is pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.15, Raebareli. It is contended that as the parties have compromised consequently, proceedings pending against the applicant be quashed.

¶8

On the other hand, Sri Yogesh Soni, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 also states that parties have entered into the compromise pertaining to the aforesaid proceedings.

¶9

In order to ascertain the veracity of the compromise, let the parties concerned appear before the Court concerned on 04.10.2024.

¶10

The learned trial Court shall verify the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶12

It would be open for the parties to approach this Court in case any cause of action arises.

¶13

Till verification of the compromise, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in pursuance of the aforesaid proceedings.

¶14

Order Date :- 26.9.2024

¶15

A. Katiyar

¶16

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Anuj Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anuj Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajendra Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Prakash @ Jugul Kishore Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Shyam Ji Awasthi @ Shyam Awasthi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Naval Kishore Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. S.I.T. Lucknow

Khalik and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy Home, Lko. and Another

Harish Chandra vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy Home Deptt. Lko. and Others