Disposed

Vivek Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Sept 2024A482/8624/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This applicant sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC alleging an out-of-court settlement. The court adjourned the matter, directing the parties to appear before the Trial Court to verify the compromise deed within four weeks and prohibiting coercive action against the applicant for eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action against the applicant to be taken for eight weeks. Parties to appear before the Trial Court to verify the compromise.

Vivek Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:66019

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8624 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Vivek Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Sri Nijam Ahmad, Advocate, has put in appearance for the private opposite party no. 2 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶8

Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s)/petitioner(s) for quashing criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3873 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 690 of 2022 under Section 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC, P.S.Akbarpur, District-Ambedkar Nagar as well as Charge Sheet No. A-10/2023 dated 08.01.2023 including summoning order dated 10.04.2024.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 5 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed.

¶10

Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:-

¶12

(i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned Court within four week's from today.

¶13

(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record.

¶14

(iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order.

¶15

(iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed.

¶16

(v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶17

(vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned Court.

¶18

(vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case.

¶19

Order Date :- 24.9.2024 Vinay/-

¶20

Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vivek Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manglesh Kumar @ Ranjeet Goswami Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Vashi Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Shivam Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Kaneez Fatma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Others

Abdul Ali and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Subhash Chandra Tiwari vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another