Disposed

Ishtiyak Mohammad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Allahabad HC23 Sept 2024A482/8575/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Arcot HP (Lucknow Bench) disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. granting liberty to the applicant to file bail and discharge applications in the trial court. The court directed the police to refrain from coercive action for 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file bail and discharge applications with direction for expeditious consideration; direction to police to avoid coercive action for 30 days.

Ishtiyak Mohammad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65700

¶2

Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8575 of 2024 Applicant :- Ishtiyak Mohammad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶5

The present application has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶6

"For the facts, reasons and circumstances narrated in the instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C.(now under section 528 B.N.S.S.) which is duly supported with an affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to quash the chargesheet No 1/2019 dated 23-06-2019 as well as summoning order dated 09-06-2023 in case crime No. 200/2019 case no. 65959/2023 under section 5/9B(1-A) Explosive Act police station Mohanlalganj District Lucknow, State Vs. Ishtiyak Mohammad and another pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Lucknow.

¶7

It is further prayed that the entire proceeding in case crime in case crime No. 200/2019 case no. 65959/2023 under section 5/9B(1-A) Explosive Act police station Mohanlalganj District Lucknow State Vs. Ishtiyak Mohammad and another pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Lucknow may also be stayed during the pendency of the instant application."

¶8

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously.

¶9

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶11

Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶12

Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

¶13

With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 23.9.2024

¶15

Jyoti/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ishtiyak Mohammad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ishtiyak Mohammad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ravikant Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Nagendra Kumar @ Nagendra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others

Anand Kumar @ Sattan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Manglesh Kumar @ Ranjeet Goswami vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Girish and 4 others vs State of U.P and 7 others

Sumer Kumar Agarwal vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home , Lko. and Another