Hall High Court rejected an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summons order. The court held the Magistrate assigned reasons under Section 204 Cr.P.C., found no illegality, and denied the inherent jurisdiction prayer.
Prayer for quashing impugned order under S. 482 Cr.P.C. rejected; applicants summoned to face trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:112665
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8474 of 2024
Applicant :- Ramdeen And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jalaj Kumar Kushwaha,Ray Sahab Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
"पतत्रावलली पर उपलब्ध सम्पपूरर सत्राक्ष्य कके अवललोकन सके प्रथम दृष्टयत्रा इस तथ्य ककी पपुषष्ट हलोतली हहै षक षवपकलीगर रत्रामदलीन , रत्रामसससिंह, रत्राजकेश व शलीमतली रत्रामबकेटली दत् र ात्रा पररवत्रादली कके - घर मम घपुसकर गन्दली गन्दली गत्रासलयत्रासिं दकेतके हहए मत् र ापलीट करनके कत्रा अपरत्राध धत् र ात्रा
452,323,504 भत्रा०द०ससिं० कके अन्तगरत कत् र ारत करनत्रा प्रतलीत हलोतत्रा हहै , इस स्तर पर अन्य कलोई अपरत्राध बनतत्रा प्रतलीत नहहीं हलोतत्रा हहै। उक्त सस्थषत मम षवपकलीगर कलो उक्त धत् र ात्राओसिं मम जररयम सम्मन तलब षकयके जत्रानके कत्रा पयत्ाप्त आधत् र र ा हहै।
आदक े श
अषभयपुक्तगर रत्रामदलीन, रत्रामसससिंह, रत्राजकेश व शलीमतली रत्रामबकेटली कलो धत् र ात्रा 452,323,504 भत्रा०दसिं०ससिं० कके अन्तगरत षवचत् र ार हकेतपु तलब षकयत्रा जत्रायके। पररवत्रादली अन्दर सप् त ह षनयमत्रानपुसत् र ा पहैरवली करके। तत्पश्चत्रात अषभयपुक्तगर पर सम्मन जत् र ाली हलो। पतत्रावलली वत्रास्तके हत्रासजरली अषभयपुक्तगर षदनत्रासिंक- 25.04.2022 कलो पकेश हलो।"
Order Date :- 15.7.2024 AK
Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order summoning the applicants under Sections 452, 323, 504 IPC should be quashed on inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Whether the Magistrate assigned sufficient grounds for proceeding under Section 204 Cr.P.C.
Whether discharging inherent jurisdiction requires assignment of reasons by the Magistrate.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar AntilReferred¶15
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramdeen and 3 Others
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
